Artificial intelligence can power transformative products, but building an AI tool that users actually trust and return to requires more than connecting to an API. It demands a new layer of UX design, tuned specifically to probabilistic systems, emergent behavior, and human-AI collaboration. At Polyform, we have seen where AI products fail to gain traction and where better UX would have made all the difference.
Here are the five most common AI product design mistakes we encounter, and how to avoid them when designing with GPT or any generative model:
1. Treating GPT as a Black Box
The Mistake: Many teams deploy AI features where users submit open-ended prompts into an invisible engine, expecting coherent results. This places the burden of success entirely on the user to understand system boundaries and capabilities.
How to Fix It: Scaffold user inputs through structured templates, dynamic suggestion builders, and guided query construction. Reduce ambiguity at the input stage. Clear affordances and sample inputs lead to higher quality outputs and a smoother user experience.
2. Hiding Model Reasoning and Confidence
The Mistake: When users receive AI outputs with no indication of confidence, source reliability, or decision pathways, trust erodes rapidly. Outputs feel arbitrary, making users hesitant to rely on the system.
How to Fix It: Surface system reasoning through features like confidence indicators, source attributions, or rationale previews. Allow users to see not just what the AI produced, but how and why. Trustworthy AI UX is explainable by default.
3. Over-automating and Disempowering Users
The Mistake: Automating entire workflows without user override or transparency creates brittle, one-size-fits-all experiences. Users are left without control when edge cases or nuanced goals arise.
How to Fix It: Embrace co-creation over full automation. Design for adjustable outputs, editable AI suggestions, and iterative user feedback loops. Empower users to shape, refine, or reject AI contributions easily, maintaining agency and ownership.
4. Neglecting Edge Cases and Model Failure Modes
The Mistake: AI systems are probabilistic, not deterministic. They will fail under ambiguity, adversarial input, or unfamiliar scenarios. Ignoring these failure paths leaves users stranded when things inevitably go wrong.
How to Fix It: Proactively design fallback pathways. Offer options like "Regenerate," "Clarify," or "Escalate to human support." Treat failure handling not as an afterthought, but as a primary part of the UX architecture.
5. Designing as if Traditional UX Rules Still Apply
The Mistake: Applying conventional UI/UX patterns to AI systems without adaptation results in interfaces that feel inconsistent or frustrating. Linear user flows and deterministic system behaviors do not map cleanly to AI-driven products.
How to Fix It: Shift to probabilistic UX design. Plan for non-linear workflows, incomplete information, emergent user goals, and system uncertainty. Use progressive disclosure, adaptive interfaces, and lightweight correction mechanisms to accommodate the realities of human-AI interaction.
Final Thoughts: Human-Centered AI Product Design Wins
Building with GPT, large language models, or other AI systems is as much about UX design as it is about model performance. Retention, trust, and user satisfaction hinge on designing for ambiguity, transparency, and collaboration from day one.
At Polyform, we help founders and product teams move beyond simple model integration to craft deeply usable, human-centered AI products. If you are serious about building AI tools that users actually adopt and champion, let us show you how.
Thanks for joining us!
Now check your spam folder to secure your newsletter
More thoughts
Hire Polyform and bring the power of design to your startup.
Collaborate with Polyform to bring your big idea to market faster, better, & stronger.